4 گھنٹے پہلے
China Seeks Over 61,800 BTC Held in UK in $5.7B Investment Fraud Recovery
Chinese prosecutors are moving to confiscate a large cache of cryptocurrency and other assets tied to a multibillion-dollar fraud, asking UK courts to hand over more than 61,800 Bitcoin plus other coins and property that they say are proceeds of a 40.38 billion yuan (about $5.7 billion) investment scheme.
The Tianjin No. 2 Intermediate People's Court said on Oct. 13 that it had accepted a request to recover assets allegedly generated by an illegal fundraising operation run by Qian Zhimin, also known as Yadi Zhang. The court formally accepted the case on Sept. 28, opening a six-month window for affected investors and other interested parties to join the confiscation proceedings.
Prosecutors want to seize cryptocurrency along with cash, jewelry, financial products and real estate said to have been bought with illicit proceeds. Investors who stay out of the current proceedings remain eligible for compensation from any recovered assets.
The alleged scheme
From April 2014 to August 2017, Tianjin Lantian Gerui Electronic Technology, controlled by Qian, is accused of raising 40.378 billion yuan through unlicensed wealth-management products marketed in several Chinese cities. The products promised guaranteed principal and extremely high returns, reported at up to 300%, drawing commitments that ranged from hundreds of thousands to millions of yuan.
Prosecutors say the money was recycled to pay earlier investors, fund fake projects and buy crypto, property, vehicles and luxury goods, leaving more than 102,000 investors with combined losses above 19.9 billion yuan.
Assets named in the request
The confiscation application identifies a crypto portfolio that includes:
- more than 61,800 BTC
- over 72,700 Bitcoin Cash
- more than 3.6 million XRP
- holdings of Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin SV, Dogecoin and other tokens
Prosecutors are seeking illegal proceeds, property bought with them and income generated by the assets, less any amounts already returned to investors under applicable law.
Cross-border investigation and arrests
Qian fled China in July 2017 carrying a computer said to hold crypto wallet access. She entered Britain on a St. Kitts and Nevis passport under the name Yadi Zhang and, investigators say, worked with associates to convert cryptocurrency into cash and assets. British police began tracing the funds in 2018, and searches that year of a London property and a safe-deposit box recovered devices and private keys that gave access to significant Bitcoin holdings.
Qian was arrested in April 2024 after a joint British-Chinese investigation. Her associate Jian Wen was sentenced in 2024 to six years and eight months for laundering crypto tied to the fraud. Qian pleaded guilty to money laundering in September 2025 and was sentenced to 11 years and eight months at Southwark Crown Court on Nov. 11.
Legal fight over ownership in the UK
The seized crypto remains subject to competing claims in British courts. In an Oct. 12 judgment, High Court Justice Mark Turner ruled that Chinese law should govern the underlying ownership claims of victims seeking a share of the cryptocurrency. The court found that the original transactions, the alleged wrongdoing and the crypto purchases all occurred in China, making Chinese law applicable to the underlying rights.
About 16,000 victims have joined recovery proceedings in the UK so far. Under Section 281 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, claimants must show a legal ownership interest to recover assets. The October ruling did not decide whether individual investors are entitled to the Bitcoin or to any appreciation since seizure; those issues remain in dispute and lawyers for some victims are appealing. British prosecutors are pursuing civil recovery separately under the Proceeds of Crime Act, and the High Court has yet to resolve the competing claims.
Why this matters
The case underscores the persistent difficulty of cross-border asset recovery involving large crypto holdings, particularly when control of wallets, the chain of transactions and the choice of applicable law are contested. How it ends will shape the way victims of large crypto-linked frauds reclaim value, and how courts weigh foreign-law claims against domestic civil-recovery rules. Further UK hearings and appeals are expected as victims, prosecutors and lawyers argue over who ultimately gets the seized cryptocurrency.